Account #1 is for my RL make-up portfolio and features several RL artistic nudes. It is seven years old. Account #2 is an avatar account almost exclusively featuring artistic nudes (like body paint, etc). It is five years old. Neither one of these accounts is moderated at all, in fact I didn't even know Flickr had filters until I opened this one two days ago. Both accounts are completely "safe" and all images are openly viewable to anyone with an internet connection.
This latest site is my first highly sexualized avatar account and because I knew some of the images would be explicit I filtered all nudity as "restricted" and set the account default to "moderate." I have been around long enough to know you don't want uncensored images floating around. I planned to use the adult shots as incentive to increase traffic anyway, so no freebies!
Within six hours I received an email from Flickr moderators informing me that they blocked my account for violating their image guidelines. They also stated that they changed my account default filter to "moderate."
This action was excessive in many ways, not the least of which being that my account default was already set to moderate! Subsequent this action I scoured the site for details regarding their filter policy and found this:
1. Safety Level
Safe - Content suitable for a global, public audience
Moderate - If you're not sure whether your content is suitable for a global, public audience but you think that it doesn't need to be restricted per se, this category is for you
Restricted - This is content you probably wouldn't show to your mum, and definitely shouldn't be seen by kids
A good rule of thumb is, bare breasts and bottoms are "moderate." Full frontal nudity is "restricted."
This is a laughably vague "guideline." Still, by this definition I OVER-censored by "restricting" view of even partial nudity. Hmmm...
My email reply began "Morons:" and continued to point this out. I proceeded to inform them that, by their own guidelines, my account did not warrant the "moderate" filter I selected and needed to be reset to "safe." In reply, I got a repeat of the boilerplate "you have been moderated" email.
Double "Hmmm..."
This unacceptable cover photo features almost half of one partially nude butt cheek!
Well, my cleavage is kind of indecent, I guess.
In search of an explanation I visited the forums and was given some rather unnerving information. Apparently tight clothing counts as nudity on Flickr. So does any part of a bare butt or breast. But only for this Flickr account.
Cowed into submission, I re-shot my images.
I received a polite email stating that I was still in violation, as my images were still filtered incorrectly.
"Moderate" may cover artistic nudes or partial nudity, but these nipples are "restricted!"
Don't forget that I set my account to "moderate" to start with. Not only does that mean I complied fully with their guidelines, there was no need to change my account to "moderate" at all. They negated their own direction from the very beginning. For this account.
In my final email I shared that they don't deserve me and told them to go fuck themselves.
Its clear that these images are not desired by Flickr. It is also clear that they have a policy to ostracize and harass this kind of account. There is simply no other explanation for their baseless repeated actions and nonsense explanations.
I do not condone censorship. While I agree that taste and consideration should be applied to what images are made public in an open forum, this persecution goes beyond all reason. It is targeted, and it is unacceptable. Why on earth should we continue to promote it?
Flickr has many competitors on which to display my glorious pixels - organizations that encourage diversity, art and expression. I am taking immediate steps to remove all of my accounts to one of these deserving platforms. I will keep you posted on my progress and update with a link to my new account once I find the home that suits us best!
In the meantime, start packing up your files. We're moving out!
3/8: suddenly my account is "safe." Really. Mhhhmmm.
IMAGE HOSTING SITES
Photobucket: My very first account was actually here and I still use it. Photobucket is Flickr's most direct competitor. While there are benefits to using this platform, the interface is messier than I would like and currently there are issues with it flashing in and out making it impossible to log in or select what you would like to do. 1/4/16: I included a link to this post in my email to photobucket and received this in reply:
Photobucket Abuse Team (Photobucket Support)
Jan 4, 12:56 PM
Nudity
and partial nudity (such as sheer clothing) is a violation of our terms
of use also. You will need to find a provider that allows it. Fail. NEXT!
Deviant Art: This is a strong contender. The real artists live here and it would be a good fit for that reason alone. I will post on the specifics ASAP.
Nope - no nudity there either which is weird because I've seen it. Hmmm... next.
Tumbler: I understand I can tie the blog in here so that is a big plus. I know it is less restrictive as my understanding is that its Facebook for pervs. More details as they come in.